Friday, March 26, 2010

Paradox: Property owners you have to do your part

Here's a paradox: Why have property taxes generally risen over the past couple years, even as real estate values have plummeted?The long answer is complicated, but the short one is simple:

Property owners have not systematically appealed their tax bills. Indeed, few are aware that an appeal is even an option.Until now, that is. The trend is finally shifting, The Wall Street Journal reported last week, as homeowners across the nation mobilize to protest tax bills they believe do not reflect the current value of their homes.

Taxpayers in Missouri and Illinois have formed real-estate-tax protest groups. In Michigan, the state's top tax court is tied up with more than 24,000 cases filed by homeowners protesting their assessments. Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey recently
proposed an unprecedented 2.5 percent cap on property tax hikes. New Jersey has the highest property taxes in the country, a source of much voter unrest in a largely Democratic state that ousted its Democratic governor in favor of the Republican Christie. And in Clark County, Nev.-- dubbed "the nation's foreclosure capital" by the Los Angeles Times -- homeowners now line up at the Clark County Government Building to plead with a board that their property values be lowered, so they can pay lower taxes in the recession-plagued state.

A survey done by the nonprofit group National League of Cities reported that 25 percent of cities in the U.S. raised their property tax rates in the 2009 fiscal year in response to plummeting tax revenues. Meanwhile, property values have taken a 22.3 percent dip from 2006 to 2009, according to the National Board of Realtors.Unless you have an extremely fastidious tax assessor, the odds are good that your home's tax bill has not been adjusted downward to reflect its value in a declining market. That leaves the burden of reassessment squarely on the homeowner.

Procedures to appeal local property tax raises and can be hard to find out about and are often tedious, but certainly not insurmountable. The first step is to visit your local jurisdiction and learn more about the procedures in your area. It is important to understand how property values are assessed, how that assessed value is taxed, how often assessments occur, and what is the exact process to appeal the assessment. During the housing boom, the National Taxpayers Union estimated that as many as 60 percent of all homes are over-assessed. One can only imagine how high that figure might be in today's market.

Key signs that a property has been over-assessed include errors in your property's description on the tax bill; comparable homes in your neighborhood selling for less than your appraised value; and the presence of recently emerging depreciation factors in your area, such as re-zoning, an increase in traffic, new industry or increasing drainage issues. Also, many states have property-tax credit programs for low-income residents, as for senior citizens and the disabled. California, Oregon, Texas and Minnesota sponsor tax-deferral programs, which place an "increasing lien" on the properties of residents who can't afford to pay. When the property is sold, counties collect the accrued tax plus interest from the buyer. The for-profit American Homeowners Association provides a kit to guide you through the property tax appeal process for $29.95; some bare-bones guides are available from local tax authorities. However, experts warn against paying high fees on to online services promising to take care of the details for you.Whatever route you choose, if property values have dropped significantly in your area, now is an ideal time to question tax bills that have headed in the other direction. Deadlines to appeal vary by region, but generally fall in the spring.

14 comments:

sojourner said...

We have one of our PISD board members that serves on the appraisal board. That should be a conflict of interest. A wiser taxpayer community would have never allowed that to happen.
He is also up for re-election in May and has a formidable opponent. This opponent could prove to be trustworthy if elected. She is smart enough to not run her mouth to anyone that will listen.
Our current board member (and appraisal board member) has proven many times that he can not be trusted and needs to be replaced.

Jim L. Richardson said...

Serving on the school board and serving on the appraisal board should be a "no-no".

Who would even want to do that? I assume that most people would know better than try and attempt it.

It is a compromising and no win situation. It must be an ego booster in this case. That is about all this particular board member has going for him.

Cicerone said...

Both of you seem to know this character very well. How well do you really know him?

Do you know him well enough to know there are things that he would not like people to know?

Cicerone said...

By the way, I have been following this blog and with election time approaching things could get interesting.

Cicerone said...

The only real job he ever had he was fired for stealing. Does that make you feel secure with entrusting him to make major school and taxing decisions for you?

Cicerone said...

There are several of his school board signs up over town. Do the people favoring him really know him?

They may think they do but if they knew the truth about him those signs would disappear.

watchingu said...

I was told by a reliable source that If they saw how much money he spent at a Houston strip joint paying to be fondled while attending a school board convention along with his ex-board member and slum lord friend. Both grinning like possums they would make their wives and girlfriends extremely proud.

watchingu said...

While on the appraisal board, he has been heard saying he would make sure Pilgrim;s paid their share and then some. Guess he is still mad at them for canning hin back in the 90's

our money said...

Accusations are not always true. Without providing proof of such please limit your comments and personal attacks with regards to ANY individual.

The only fact is that the individual serves on both the PISD board and the CAD board. There is no prohibition against such; however, it is construed as a conflict of interest and should be addressed with the proper authorities. I have been informed that this would require the folks in Austin to tend to this conflict of interest matter.

sojourner said...

He has bragged about the "strip joints" in my presence.

sojourner said...

Surely he wasn't using PISD funds as school board travel expense.

Jim L. Richardson said...

Let me be first to go on record and say that there are storm clouds gathering. I predict that it will be quite a blow.

Cicerone said...

I think the "strip club" expense should be accounted for. If you are representing the PISD and drawing daily per diem, hotel rooms and meals, then you should be taking care of only school business.
Does anyone know whether they took Twi-Lite with them?
Is this the way stewards of our taxpayer dollars do their job?

watchingu said...

twi-lite didn't have time to go. she was too busy praying on how she was going get her way on another athletic facility. you know those who never miss church on Sunday, and lie and connive all week are the ones you have to fear.the actions of the lamb and the viciousness of the wolf pretty much describes twi-lite super.