PISD rhetoric two

Last posted about the discussion of a possible bond election. At one of the coffee shop round table discussions this AM it was reported and discussed that a PISD educator has possibly violated her duties by engaging in inappropriate acts with a student of the PISD. The law does not look kindly on such an individual who prey upon those they are to educate in a more appropriate manner.

Is the PISD keeping this on the quiet side in order to not negatively impact a possible future bond election? The mind is left to wonder on its own! The PISD has come forth with no statements to at least acknowledge the possible incident and any action they may have taken.

OK, I give them the benefit of the doubt in protecting the educator for the possible violation of trust. I believe innocent until proven guilty. It appears the PISD has put the individual on leave with pay pending outcome of investigation (this is not confirmed). As a grandparent with a grandchild in the PISD system I would want and demand to know what the possibilities are and could be with regard to my grandchild having contact with this educator. I guess no one in the PISD administration has children, grandchildren, etc.

They already had one educator this year removed from the employment rolls for having 'weed' in his auto on campus. PISD administration never made any public comments with regards to this incident. Least we forget the PISD board member who was cited in another county for having alcohol on school property. Once again this proves bad leadership on behalf of the administration of the PISD. You want a first class school system then start cleaning house and start with Twi-light Super.